Post by Boaster on Sept 2, 2023 10:52:34 GMT -6
Hegelian Dialectic thinking, whether on one side or the other, moves to one end: synthesis.
It's always two opposing ideologies, they get rubbed together: conflict and controversy. The result is, or can be, an amalgamation.
Thesis against anti-thesis, and synthesis as a result. In a manner of speaking, survival of the fittest?
The whole idea, which many attribute to conservative types, of "the Jews" and bankers, or any manner of boogey man, is merely a front: a facade. Always a diversion.
Thesis: anti-thesis. White: black. Up: down.… Male: Female. If they are diametrically opposed, they shall be rubbed together: something new shall emerge.
Consider this lecture: www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Q18iSz6mus
It's always two opposing ideologies, they get rubbed together: conflict and controversy. The result is, or can be, an amalgamation.
Thesis against anti-thesis, and synthesis as a result. In a manner of speaking, survival of the fittest?
The whole idea, which many attribute to conservative types, of "the Jews" and bankers, or any manner of boogey man, is merely a front: a facade. Always a diversion.
Thesis: anti-thesis. White: black. Up: down.… Male: Female. If they are diametrically opposed, they shall be rubbed together: something new shall emerge.
Consider this lecture: www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Q18iSz6mus